‍Subscribe or Die: Why Apps Want Monthly Rent and Whether It Will Last

Apps are shifting from one-time buys to monthly or yearly subscriptions. That change is not random. It is deliberate. It buys companies predictable revenue, easier product updates, and higher lifetime value. It also creates new problems for users and new limits for businesses. Here is how it works and why the future will be mixed.

What changed
‍

For consumers the cost of apps moved from a single purchase to a steady stream of small payments. For businesses the math changed the other way around. Recurring billing turns uncertain, lumpy revenue into a steady cash flow that supports continuous development, marketing, and expansion. The result is a big and growing pool of money in mobile and desktop ecosystems.

Snapchat recently announced it will limit free “Memories” storage to 5 GB. Users who exceed that limit will need to pay for a “Memories Storage Plan” (100 GB, 250 GB with Snapchat+, or 5 TB with Snapchat Platinum).

Snap says it will provide a 12-month grace period for users whose stored Memories exceed 5 GB, giving them time either to upgrade or download their content before deletion begins. Snap frames it as necessary to “support Snapchatters with more than 5 GB” and continue investing in the Memories feature.

This shift is a high-visibility example of what we see across app ecosystems: converting a cost center or lightly monetized feature into a recurring revenue stream.

Why companies prefer subscriptions

1. Predictable revenue. Subscriptions smooth income and make forecasting easier. That lowers risk and raises valuations. Zuora’s data show subscription-first companies have grown faster than the broader market. 
2. Higher lifetime value. Ongoing fees stack up. Companies can earn more per user over time than with a one-time sale.
   
   
3. Continuous engagement. Subscriptions incentivize ongoing product improvements and feature rollouts. They also reduce piracy pressure.
   
   
4. Upsell and bundling. Tiered plans and add-ons let companies extract more value from heavy users.
   
   

Why consumers push back

Subscriptions help some users and frustrate others. People like regular updates and lower upfront cost. They also notice the mounting monthly total if they subscribe to many services. Research and surveys show subscription fatigue is real. Many users say they are not increasing total subscription spend and are tired of managing multiple services.

Is the model sustainable

‍
Short answer: selectively. Subscriptions are sustainable when the service delivers ongoing, perceivable value. They work well for software that needs constant updates, cloud services, media libraries, and AI models that require continuous compute and data investment. Adobe is the poster child. After moving Creative Suite to Creative Cloud, Adobe turned a volatile license business into a predictable subscription engine and large, steady revenues.

They are less sustainable when the service is a single feature or a niche utility with low switching costs. If customers use a feature once in a while they will cancel. If pricing feels opaque or value drops, churn will rise and acquisition costs will swallow margins. Harvard Business Review long ago warned that subscriptions are terrific for some businesses and terrible for others.

Will more brands adopt subscriptions

Yes, but not everywhere and not forever. I mean, trends pushing adoption:
• Cloud and AI raise operating costs that favor recurring revenue.
• Consumers expect continuous improvements and integrations.
• Platforms and app stores now support in-app subscriptions and lifecycle tools.

But constraints will slow blanket adoption:

• Subscription fatigue limits how many monthly checks consumers will write
• Price sensitivity forces clearer value tiers and better retention tactics.
• Regulatory and platform fee pressures may change economics for some app types.

How this will evolve

Expect more nuance rather than one rule for all. Look for:
• Feature subscriptions inside apps rather than full-app tolls.
• Bundles and marketplaces that simplify many subscriptions into one bill.
• More annual discounts, usage-based tiers, and pause rather than cancel options.
• Greater emphasis on retention metrics rather than download numbers.

What brands should do

1. Prove recurring value fast. Show impact within days or weeks.
   
   
2. Build transparent pricing and simple cancel flows. Bad cancellation practices cost trust.
   
   
3. Test hybrid models: free core access plus paid premium features.
   
   
4. Focus on retention metrics: churn, net revenue retention, and LTV to CAC ratios.
   
   

What consumers should do

1. Inventory monthly bills quarterly.
   
   
2. Use family or bundle plans where available.
   
   
3. Choose annual plans only when value is clear.
   
   
4. Push for trial periods and clear usage reports.
   
   

Bottom line

‍
Subscriptions are not a fad. They are a structural shift for digital services that need ongoing investment. The model scales when users see continuous value. It fails when subscriptions become rental payments with no new benefits. The future will be a mix of more subscription offers, smarter bundles, and stronger pressure from consumers to get clear value for the monthly charge.

‍